#2·Litentry Inflation Model Proposal

Democracy
2 Comments
NotPassed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up 1
Share
Votes
18.2%Aye
Passing thresholdSimpleMajority
81.8%Nay
Aye
107.92LIT
Nay
484.8LIT
Turnout
1.15KLIT
Electorate
0LIT
Failed
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline2
  • Votes Bubble
Comments

We have discussed extensively this proposal in the telegram chat.

We believe, as a community, that there could be significant amendments to this. Primarily we would like to see:

A) Inflation being delayed (and further justified) while collators/stakers get paid out-of-pocket from the ecosystem for a shortened testing period (i.e., a few months). Token burns could be welcomed if justified appropriately.
B) Consider that the 5 of out 8 Litentry Collators does mean that you are essentially paying yourselves. That's fine, time is money, and effort as well. But, perhaps weigh the rewards 40-60 to incentivize participation form.
B) Please, the team shouldn't submit a referenda like this out of left-field to a blind community. Engage them explaining the benefits and costs. (Participation is so poor, too)

Thanks team, we believe in ya'll.

Reply
Up

Edited

Reply
Up